A tailored review for Burtons Solicitors · Bexley first

Your local reputation is already working. Could paid search bring it more instructions?

I looked at how people searching for probate and wills solicitors find firms around Bexley and neighbouring areas. Burtons already appears in local results. The question is whether carefully chosen paid visibility could turn that strength into commercially worthwhile new instructions.

Prepared by Prince Enwere · ThinkingMan Creative · November 2026
01 / What the searches revealed

Visible locally. Not always in the paid positions.

The search review showed established national providers buying prominent positions for services Burtons already offers. That does not mean Burtons lacks visibility. It suggests there may be another way to reach prospective clients before they choose a provider.

probate solicitor Bexley
Sponsored results observed in the review · illustrative layout
Burtons Solicitors · Local results

Appeared in the Bexley map results and organic listings, rather than the reviewed paid positions.

The important distinction

Build on a strength, rather than starting from scratch.

Strong Bexley visibility

Burtons appeared in local map results across the Bexley terms reviewed, with probate, wills and conveyancing already supported by organic presence.

National advertisers above local results

Co-op Legal Services, Farewill and Octopus Legacy appeared in sponsored searches for probate. Other specialists and comparison sites appeared across wills and conveyancing.

One further point worth checking

The Bexley map listing and Bexley office page showed different phone numbers in the research. Aligning local contact details would help any campaign and organic enquiries alike.

Search appearances are snapshots and can differ by time, device and location. The illustrations show selected names from the review, not a live Google page or exact ranking order.

02 / Where I would start

Not every service needs the same investment.

I would begin with the service that offers the clearest test of commercial value, rather than spreading a modest budget across every department and office.

01 · PRIORITY TEST

Probate in Bexley

Focus on high-intent probate enquiries across Bexley and nearby catchments. Measure not only enquiries, but which ones become confirmed instructions and what those instructions are worth.

02 · SECONDARY OPPORTUNITY

Wills and lasting powers of attorney

Potentially lower-cost searches worth exploring once real demand and fees are understood. No extra revenue from these services has been included in the core probate model.

03 · PROTECT EFFICIENCY

Conveyancing and other services

Burtons already has strong organic visibility here. Paid activity should only be added if its acquisition costs and actual fee economics justify it.

The commercial principle

“We work backwards from profit rather than clicks. What is an instruction worth? What can we afford to spend acquiring it? And does the result justify doing more?”

03 / Adjustable commercial model

What might a Bexley probate test return?

This is a working scenario, not a revenue forecast. Adjust the advertising budget or average probate fee and compare cautious versus realistic conversion assumptions. It is designed to be challenged with Burtons' actual numbers.

Working assumptions

Search and conversion assumptions

Estimated CPC: £10.50 · Click to enquiry: 7% · Enquiry to instruction: 30%

ThinkingMan proposed fees

£600/month base fee + £350 per confirmed probate instruction. The success fee is deducted from the modelled return.

CPC was informed by the prospect research and supplied Keyword Planner notes. Conversion rates are illustrative assumptions, not Burtons' historical results.

Illustrative year-one economics

Modelled probate fee revenue£25,200
New instructions / year14
Estimated enquiries / year48
Annual advertising spend£7,200
ThinkingMan base fee / year£7,200
Success fees / year£4,900
Break-even instructions10
Fee revenue less advertising and agency fees+£5,900

Annual clicks = annual ad spend ÷ working CPC. Annual enquiries and instructions are rounded to whole numbers for display. Revenue = modelled instructions × average probate fee. The contribution shown deducts the advertising budget, monthly ThinkingMan fee and per-instruction success fee.

How the scenario accumulates across 12 months

Illustrative even distribution, not predicted month-by-month results

Results will not arrive evenly in practice. Timing depends on search demand, enquiry handling and how quickly instructions are completed.

04 / A sensible route to expansion

Prove the case in one area. Then decide what deserves to scale.

Phase one · Bexley

A focused local test

Start with probate demand around Bexley, Sidcup, Bexleyheath, Welling and Crayford. Confirm accurate local contact details, track calls and forms, and connect enquiries to actual instructions. Refine targeting and spend based on quality, not click volume.

First market to prove
Phase two · Medway, if justified

Apply the learning, not just the budget.

Chatham and Walderslade could be a natural next test, but only after Bexley produces enough reliable evidence. The expansion decision would depend on local demand, instruction values, close rates and the firm's capacity. No Medway revenue is included in the Bexley model.

Conditional expansion
05 / ThinkingMan Creative

We'd rather earn more when this works.

The base fee supports the strategy and ongoing management. The success-based element is linked to confirmed probate instructions, so a portion of our compensation follows the commercial outcome, not simply the traffic.

Paid media strategy, starting with the researched Google Search opportunity
Google and Meta where each channel can justify its role
Local targeting, landing-page and enquiry-quality improvements
Call, form and instruction-level measurement
Reporting focused on acquisition cost and commercial return
Direct strategy and account ownership from Prince
Proposed structure
£600 / month

ThinkingMan base management fee


+ £350

per confirmed probate instruction attributable to the activity, subject to agreed tracking and attribution terms


Advertising spend is separate and paid directly to the platform. Fees and assumptions are part of the working proposal, not an obligation.

Agency capability. Direct specialist relationship.

I personally handle the marketing science, strategy and account.

The next conversation

Replace the assumptions with Burtons' real numbers.

If this looks interesting, I'd welcome the chance to compare the model with your actual fee mix, conversion rates and margins. Even if it doesn't lead anywhere, I hope the local search findings are useful.

Talk it through with Prince